English copyright law does not protect ‘ideas’ but the shipway in which these ideas are verbalized. This was constituted in Harman Pictures NV v Osborne (1967) and lately affirmed in the causa involving the Da Vinci Encrypt refreshing, Baigent and Leigh v The Random Theater Radical (2006).Where the study has been literally reproduced thither can be no head of copying. Still, trouble arises where use is made of elusive aspects of dash, ordinarily referred to as ‘non textual’ copying. The gremlin that copyright law has had on the estimator diligence and net use has too led to often discourse roughly